Portion 127

Golden Text: Deuteronomy 19.
Readings for the week:

Day 1: Deuteronomy 19

Day 2: 1 Samuel 2

Day 3: Psalm 28

Day 4: Psalm 32

Day 5: Psalms 61-62

Day 6: Psalm 90

I- Three more cities of refuge.

The word for ‘city of refuge’ is miqlat, the root of which also has to do with ‘absorption’ (קלט). That is, the person would be completely absorbed by this city as his solution of refuge from the avenger. It was a kind of rehabilitation center where the person damaged by what happened was “absorbed”, giving way to someone new and restored.

It was not just fleeing for the sake of fleeing, but it was the search for the rehabilitation of society. That is why these cities were administered by the Levites, who would comfort, encourage, and become teachers and patterns of conduct for these people.

Portion 109 explains about cities of refuge, but this week’s Portion gives a detail about it: “When the Lord your God destroys the nations whose land the Lord your God is giving you, and you inherit them, and dwell in their cities and in their houses; you shall separate three cities in the midst of the land which the Lord your God is giving you to possess.»[1]. At a previous time, God had said that there were six that they should create as they settled in the promised land, so why does Moses point to three more now? The text clearly says that these three would be built when all the cities on earth that they came to were destroyed.

We know that historically this never happened; so, these three cities were never added. The cause was simple, the people never lived up to the divine demands to receive the promise that had been made to them. That is why it says in verse 8 in a paraphrased way: “As long as you keep these commandments, God will enlarge the territory.”

In the light of the gospel, we know that with the whole Torah God was trying to show man his sinful nature, and it was that condition that did not allow them to do everything they knew they should do. Thus, this promise was reserved for the times of the messianic redemption.

II- Bad actions without bad intentions.

It is possible to find biblical commentators who, allegorically, see these three cities mentioned here as a reference to Peace, Truth, and Good. Because these characteristics are a true refuge in which God allows his children to dwell when they are amid their own “accidental” errors, whether against their brothers or the world, that is why the text speaks of “accidental homicides”.[2]

Then in vv.11-13 he mentions that those who commit “intentional homicide” are not to be in these cities, but outside. Because it is not the same to seek rehabilitation for an action without intentions, as it is to do it when there was one.

This is a mistake made by many spiritual counselors in local churches, treating the culprit with psychological resources when their real healing is found in repentance. That is, they must “die” to sin and be born again. Beware of these conscious culprits must beware, because many times when it comes to rehabilitating someone who is guilty their “city of refuge” becomes a justification for continuing the sin. Those who are born again and make a mistake, no matter how serious, will always find in these “cities” (a spiritual congregation that welcomes them) the resource to learn and make amends for their wrong.

Questions:

1.- In your opinion, what would it be like to be absorbed by peace, truth, and goodness when a spiritual crime is committed accidentally?

2.- How do you understand vv.5,7 of Ps 32 to relate considering this portion?

3.- What differences do you find between these spiritual tools that God gives to His distressed people (peace, truth, and good) with any of the psychological methods used today?

[1] Dt 19:1–2.

[2] The word homicide here should not be assumed only as killing, but also, in an expanded spiritual perspective, as any action that involves sin.

Under Construction..

MAKE A DIFERENCE TODAY